Can gendered robots change children's gender stereotyping or reinforce them?: A reconsideration of Indian television series and cartoons like Karishma Kaa Karishma and ViR: The Robot Boy
Keywords:
Robot; gender; animation; gender-stereotypical; technology;Abstract
Originally an American invention in the second half of the twentieth century, the inclusion of robots as characters in animation and television series was a direct product of the intersection of digital technologies, creative industries, and global capitalism. Even though the general Indian audience of the time, aloof from computers and robots, relied on vicarious methods like film, literature, television, and the press to shape their mental representations of robots and make up for the lack of a direct, experiential base with digital technologies, today, among the fifty centrally registered channels in the country, broadcasting both Indian and foreign cartoons and over five-hundred entertainment channels broadcasting sitcoms and reality shows, which were for the most part white-washed, gender-stereotypical and majoritarian, robots have fortuitously featured as characters. Airing its first episode in 2003, the Indian remake of the 1980s American TV series Small Wonder, Karishma Kaa Karishma brought the first Indian robot character “Karishma” on the national screen, followed by “ViR” ten years later, from the animated series named ViR: The Robot Boy, however bound by their share of problems and prejudices. In this paper, I attempt to analyse the role of the gendered robot characters “Karishma” and “ViR” on children, linking popular aesthetics to social structures, to study if attribution of gender in robots change or reinforce the way children view cultural stereotypes of gender in society, through select episodes from both the shows.
References
Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” “Lenin and Philosophy” and Other Essays, translated by B.Brewster, Monthly Review Press, 2001, pp. 85-126.
Buikema, Rosemarie, et al., editors. “The Arena of the Body: The Cyborg and Feminist Views on Biology.” Doing Gender in Media, Art and Culture, 2nd ed., Taylor and Francis Ltd, 2017, p. 24. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876800-10.
Cheung, William. “Donna Haraway: Manifestly Haraway. The Cyborg Manifesto. The Companion Species Manifesto. Companions in Conversation (With Cary Wolfe).
Eyssel, Friederike, and Frank Hegel. “(S)He’s Got the Look: Gender Stereotyping of Robots 1.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 42, no. 9, Wiley, July 2012, pp. 2213–30. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00937.x.
Ford, Jessica. “Rebooting Roseanne: Feminist Voice Across Decades.” M/C Journal, Queensland University of Technology, Dec. 2018, https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.1472.
Hall, Stuart, et al., editors. Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79. 1980. Bowker, https://doi.org/10.1604/9780415079068.
Haraway, Donna. “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s.” Cambridge University Press eBooks, Cambridge UP, 1987, pp. 82–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511570940.007.
Haraway, Donna. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies, vol. 14, no. 3, JSTOR, 1988, p. 575. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
“Is Karishma adopted?” Karishma Kaa Karishma, created by Vincent Franklin, season 1, episode 2, Alliance Media & Entertainment Productions, 2004.
Miller, Danny, et al. How The World Changed Social Media. 2016.
Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2016. (Posthumanities 37). 360 Pp.” Arcadia, vol. 52, no. 1, Walter de Gruyter GmbH, May 2017, pp. 267–69. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1515/arcadia-2017-0021.
Moser, Franziska, and Jackie Masterson. “Are There Signs of Change in Gendered Language Use in Children’s Early Reading Vocabulary?” Gender and Language, vol. 8, no. 1, Equinox Publishing, Mar. 2014, pp. 71–90. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v8i1.71.
Pillow, Bradford H., et al. “Young Children’s Use of Gender for Inductive Generalizations About Biological and Behavioral Characteristics: The Influence of Gender Categories and Gender Stereotypes.” Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, vol. 9, no. 2, Canadian Center of Science and Education, July 2019, p. 37. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v9n2p37.
Rabinovitz, Lauren. “Sitcoms and Single Moms: Representations of Feminism on American TV.” Journal of Cinema and Media Studies, University of Texas Press, Jan. 1989, https://doi.org/10.2307/1225298.
Silvio, Teri. “Animation: The New Performance?” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, vol. 20, no. 2, Society for Linguistic Anthropology, Dec. 2010, pp. 422–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01078.x.
Smythe, Dallas W. “Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism.” Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory/Revue Canadienne De Theorie Politique Etsociale, vol. 1, no. 3, Dec. 1977, journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/download/13715/4463.
Takagi, Miyako. “Japanese Society: Where Humans and Robots Coexist.” International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, EJournal Publishing, Oct. 2020, pp. 13–16. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.18178/ijssh.2020.v10.1006.
Tuchman, Gaye. “Women’s Depiction by the Mass Media.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 4, no. 3, University of Chicago Press, Apr. 1979, pp. 528–42. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1086/493636.